Search for: "State v. Phillips "
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2013, 9:31 am
LITTLE v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:20 am
STALLMAN v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:16 pm
PICOZZI v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:52 am
HOFFMAN, v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:56 pm
Cieszyski v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:40 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: STATE OF WYOMING, ex rel., WYOMING WORKERS’ SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
See Phillips, 775 F.3d at 543.) [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:15 pm
Hawaii v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:49 pm
Constitution.In Marsh v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:39 am
The ABA Journal is reporting that Justice Sonia Sotomayor told the managing partner of Sydney Austin's Washington, D.C. office, Carter Phillips, to "slow down from the rhetoric", as Phillips began his argument before the High Court on behalf of the State of California in the Schwarznegger -v- Plata prison overcrowding case.Justice Sotomayor also had a series of hard questions for California's appellate attorney such as how his… [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:49 pm
Constitution.In Marsh v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
A little history: in 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:11 am
Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272, 1283 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:05 pm
Tuesday’s second case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
" Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1314; see Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
Phillips, who often epresents the Chamber, has said that “except for the solicitor general representing the United States, no single entity has more influence on what cases the Supreme Court decides and how it decides them than the [Chamber’s] National Chamber Litigation Center. [read post]
