Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
Superior Court, and Kim v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am
Analysis:The Federal Court refused to exercise jurisdiction since a state administrative proceeding remained pending. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
”J.A. 55. (...)The principal issue this court mustaddress is whether jurisdiction in the district court wasproper in light of the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncementin Gunn v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
District Court for the District of Connecticut (Noffsinger v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
Superior Court decision clarifying meal and rest period laws. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:17 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
Superior Court decision clarifying meal and rest period laws. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Batson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
We just found out, and we're under the gun, but we thought you'd like to know that the Appellate Division of the NJ Superior Court just affirmed the defense trial win in Bessemer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Alulddin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued an important class certification decision, and it is not Dukes v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:52 am
The Superior Court has issued an opinion which could spell big trouble for Pennsylvania attorneys. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:26 am
Superior Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:55 am
So we were interested to see a state appeals court decision in favor of Countrywide coming out of Riverside Superior Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 6:46 pm
In other cases, the firm has utilized an Electronic Trial Plan in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice when employing eTrial Toolkit, which might be useful for other parties who are now adopting e-trials. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:54 am
The United States confirmed that the state courts are required to defer to the agency’s views, as expressed in an NIGC opinion letter, the Chairman’s decision disapproving the agreement, and in the United States’ amicus brief, itself: [T]he Superior Court was obliged to exercise its jurisdiction consistent with IGRA and IGRA’s bar on the enforcement of unapproved management contracts. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:00 am
As the Manitoba Court of Appeal put it in its 1993 decision Provincial Drywall Supply Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:10 am
But the Superior Court's decision is Velez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:46 am
Upon appeal, Curtis cited Dowling v. [read post]
