Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 15,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 8:55 am
As a case study, we consider Pulsifer v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:45 am
Interdiction at Sea," Univ. of Miami International & Comparative Law Review, vol. 30, no. 1 (Dec. 2022) [full-text] "Remote evaluations for humanitarian parole of asylum seekers to the United States: The case of MA," Torture Journal: Journal on Rehabilitaiton of Torture Victims and Prevention of Torture, vol. 33, no. 1 (2023) [open access] "Strengths and Resilience Among Central American Parents Seeking Asylum in the… [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:57 pm
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:38 am
Don't like the tenured faculty in Women's Studies? [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:00 am
Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Stool cultures, incubation periods, case control studies and genetic fingerprinting make or break causation in cases. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am
Russell Sandberg, Journal of Law and Society: Marking the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of S F C Milsom (1923-2016): on the value of studying legal history. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:31 am
There are serious arguments to make against state standing in Biden v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
These criss-crossing trends lead to my only real quibble with this bracing study. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:20 am
As CJ Roberts wrote for the Court last Term in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Attorney General William Barr stated in the Wall Street Journal that the belief that ESG factors are material to profitability “appears to rest more on hope than fact. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:12 pm
Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:48 am
A notable exception is the study by CRA mentioned above, which discusses the effect of royalty levels on downstream innovation. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:58 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 pm
This Article thus shows how 303 Creative could generate market humiliation — a corrosive relational process recognized by multiple studies. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
