Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Cal.) in Frankel v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The order did not require that Google take any steps around the world, it required it to take steps only where its search engine was controlled. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
Now it's poised to determine if youths should face life without a chance of parole.by Lewis BealeMiller-McCuneJuly 7, 2009The Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
KingIssue: (1) Whether the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement is contingent on a subjective determination of pursuit; and (2) what constitutes a serious offense for purposes of dispensing with the warrant requirement; and what test or tests is proper to determine when warrantless entry is permissible. [read post]
4 May 2021, 11:02 am
We recently announced The Horizon Project, a comprehensive five-year plan to take concrete action to build a more inclusive campus community. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
The Supreme Court not infrequently takes cases from returning litigants. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
The court further determined that since the contract did not have a severability clause, that it would have been inappropriate in any event to severe the offensive choice of law provision. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Oct. 14, 2014) recognizing a public performance right in sound recordings in California. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
I am also taking the short-term view, looking at only how Justice Stevens’ successor might vote differently from him in close cases. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland did not take a formal position on the merits of the case. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
It is again a question of who has authority to take action. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
I think David started to take it a little too far” and “went from handguns to big guns. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
— in California v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The Afghan military has launched a major offensive against ISIS following a massive attack in Kabul, where an Islamic State suicide bomber killed at least 80 people taking part in a peaceful protest. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
Kagan is both a sure vote for Mathis and a logical candidate to take the opinion. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
Storey v. [read post]
