Search for: "U.S. v. Young" Results 1181 - 1200 of 4,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
The Munich case over a post-passivation layer patent and the public-interest part of the ITC investigation (the ALJ found that Qualcomm should not be granted a U.S. import ban against Intel-powered iPhones due to its anticompetitive effects) are far apart not only in geographical terms. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Ross, IJ Short Circuit, on Young v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Such speech, of course, would be constitutionally protected in the U.S., at least since Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Access to Justice (A2J): for our work as lawyers, we don’t know enough about the technology that produces much of the evidence we have to deal with. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
In 1956, for example, 19 U.S. senators and approximately 80 congressmen joined forces to issue a document called the Southern Manifesto denouncing Brown as wrongly decided. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Hilary Hurd
As one Han Chinese man who has lived in Xinjiang for 20 years stated, “Entire villages in Southern Xinjiang have been emptied of young and middle-aged people—all rounded up into ‘re-education’ classes. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm by Adam Feldman
In the October 2014 term, the court heard the employment discrimination case Young v. [read post]