Search for: "United States v. Adam" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Giles Peaker
It was possible for the Defendant to carry out checks of alternative properties for suitability outside the Adam system, or to pay outside the Adam system. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am by Jim Gerl
 Congress has stated that encouraging independent living for people with disabilities is the policy of the United States government. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 7:50 am
Constitution that prohibits any religious test for any office under the United States? [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws preempt several provisions of Arizona’s S.B. 1070. [read post]