Search for: "United States v. American Can Co." Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by William S. Dodge
Section 10(b), the Court held, can apply to fraudulent conduct abroad but only if the shares in question are listed on an American exchange or otherwise sold in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 11:35 am
 First, since there can be no diversity action against the United States, the plaintiffs do not have access to federal courts unless there is a federal question. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:48 am by Dan
Well, Proview-Taiwan is suing Apple in the United States about that, claiming that the way Apple sought to buy the iPad name constituted fraud and unfair competition. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:48 am by Dan Harris
Well, Proview-Taiwan is suing Apple in the United States about that, claiming that the way Apple sought to buy the iPad name constituted fraud and unfair competition. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
  The court emphasized that a split in the circuits would be a problem as copyright law is a matter of federal law and is intended to be applied uniformly throughout the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:10 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
United States Jaycees (1984), the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects certain intimate relationships, like marriage. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
  Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which a defendant is asking the court to consider the dual-sovereignty exception to the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution that allows state and federal governments to prosecute an individual for the same action. [read post]