Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm by Schachtman
Back in the day, some Circuits of the United States Court of Appeal embraced an asymmetric standard of review of district court decisions concerning the admissibility of expert witness opinion evidence. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am by Susan Klein
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 11:23 am
Justices Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg, and Stevens all thought the United States Supreme Court ought to have sat out the dispute and left it to Congress to right any wrongs that the various efforts in Florida might have caused. . . . [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
DeStefano, Supreme Court Holds Employer Liable for Trying to Avoid Claims of Adverse Impact Discrimination   On June 29, the United States Supreme Court issued its highly-anticipated and highly-divisive decision in the “white firefighters case,” Ricci v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rachel Sachs
Jackson filed her brief  in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:45 am by Paul Fling
This week, the United States Supreme Court may have made it considerably easier for a trademark owner to recover lost profits from a trademark infringer. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Naomi Jane Gray
  The United States became a WTO member and signed the TRIPS agreement. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 5:50 pm by Lovechilde
Gore, one of the most shameful episodes in the history of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
In an earlier post I quoted Justice Sotomayor’s statement (concurring in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:50 pm
United States Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 07-10441 On Appeal From: USCA-3 Date Argued: January 21, 2009 Date Decided: April 6, 2009 5-4; Vacated and Remanded Majority: Souter(m), Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Alito(d), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas Days between argument and opinion: 75 (42) United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
" Justices Stevens, joined by Justice Breyer, filed a concurrence, explaining his view that in addition to the other limiting constructions in the majority opinion, the statute should be read to "contain an element of lasciviousness" - i.e., with the purposes of "inciting sexual arousal. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm by Deeptak Gupta
A federal trial court, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, struck down the AT&T arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law and allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the company in a class action in federal court. [read post]