Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 6,864
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2021, 7:30 am
David Gibson, AppellantUnited States of America v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 2:47 pm
” Supreme Court decides Liu On June 22, 2020, the United States Supreme Court decided Liu v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
" See, e.g., State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am
In Smith v Smith, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 5742023 (5th Cir., 2020) Colin David Smith filed a petition under the Hague Convention asserting that Sarah Elizabeth Smith wrongfully removed their children from Argentina to Texas. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
After the vote, European Parliament President David Sassoli stated that “we will all have to work hard to build a new relationship,” noting that this effort “will not be simple. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She wrote the court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
United States (Nov. 3) Attorney Lori Windham, Fulton v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
With its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
David A. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am
In this post, David McKie and Natalie Haefner, who both work at CMS and have a special interest in shipping and maritime matters, preview the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited v Nautical Challenge Ltd. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:03 am
Rollins, decided yesterday by the First Circuit (in an opinion by Judge David Barron, joined by Retired Justice David Souter and Judge Bruce Selya): Massachusetts, like other states concerned about the threat to privacy that commercially available electronic eavesdropping devices pose, makes it a crime to record another person's words secretly and without consent. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
