Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2010, 10:04 pm
Rumsfeld (2006), indicated to be a "conflict not of an international character" between the United States and al Qaeda in Afghanistan. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm by Josh Blackman
The sweetest sentence came on the penultimate page: In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am by John Inazu
  One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Leading nineteenth century legal thinkers in the United States shared this view of the suspension clause. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:26 am by Florian Mueller
Apple App Store antitrust case, Epic Games filed its opening brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit yesterday. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Secretary of State to identify and report countries whose laws prohibit adoption involving immigration to the United States. [read post]
24 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, the law is currently in flux and has focused mostly around liability for copyrights. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm by Florian Mueller
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
Humphrey and that he is in fact qualified to be President of the United States with all of the powers that entails. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Meanwhile, Robert Williams contextualized the arrest of Huawei’s CFO in Canada—reportedly at the request of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]