Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
’Rutgerson's case proceeded to a jury trial on August 25, 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Co. v Brenner, 41 NY2d 291, said that "an employee is to be loyal to his [or her] employer and is 'prohibited from acting in any manner inconsistent with his [or her] agency or trust and is at all times bound to exercise the utmost good faith and loyalty in the performance of his [or her] duties.'" In the words of the Appellate Division, “[u]nder what is commonly referred to as the faithless servant doctrine, ‘[o]ne who owes a duty of… [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:22 am
Section 3-3 prohibits “[u]sing verbally abusive language to or in front of students” and Section 3-17 prohibits “[v]iolating School rules, Board rules, policies or procedures that result in behaviors that disrupt the orderly educational process in the classroom, in the school, and may occur on or off the school grounds or assigned work location. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Rounding out this week’s old business is Hawkins v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
It takes up twelve volumes of the U. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:36 am
He also purportedly wrote the word “assume” on a piece of paper, said it could be broken into “ass,” “u,” and “me,” gestured to her “private area,” and made obscene coupling motions with his hands while suggesting they combine their “asses. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am
Nevertheless, such a philosophy did not always coincide with conservative interests, as when Burger led the court in the unanimous decision United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:24 pm
EEOC, 434 U. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:52 pm
” The Court has held [in Jones v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:13 am
EEOC, 434 U. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:25 pm
In State v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:57 pm
Nunnemaker, 501 U. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
In the case of Stone v Moore [2016] SASCFC 50 allowed the defendant’s appeal against a judgment dismissing an action for libel and awarded damages of Aus$2,000. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
On April 24, 2013, petitioner received a revised U-Rating that changed the date of the principal's and district superintendent's signatures to April 22, 2013.The Department of Education discontinued petitioner's probationary employment as of May 29, 2013, a month before the school year ended. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:54 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:54 pm
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:14 am
Vedam v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:00 am
Title VII, a “precise, complex, and exhaustive” statute, does not prohibit employment practices that are not specifically prohibited by the actCooper v N.Y. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
