Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS " Results 1201 - 1220 of 95,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 7:22 pm by Cal Law
For the links to all of 'em, flip to the jump … $350 million / L.A. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:59 am by Kevin MacNeill
The defendant successfully moved before the federal district court for dismissal of the plaintiff’s failure-to-promote claims because she was at all times a resident of Washington D.C. and so could not plead that she felt the impact of the alleged discrimination in New York City or State. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:49 am
The defendants then appealed from the judgment and the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed on all grounds, denied rehearing, and did not remand any issues to the district court. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 8:33 am
There, I did it - two items on two different issues, all for the price of one admission. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm by sushmitha.p@thomsonreuters.com
The Court further reasoned that a broad concept of duty under New Mexico law does not transform all perceived wrongs into negligence claims and that the plaintiffs did not state a claim for negligence based on allegations of having been billed at unreasonable rates, causing the plaintiffs to pay bills that were too high and, in some cases, damaging their financial stability and credit ratings. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:47 pm by sushmitha.p@thomsonreuters.com
The Court further reasoned that a broad concept of duty under New Mexico law does not transform all perceived wrongs into negligence claims and that the plaintiffs did not state a claim for negligence based on allegations of having been billed at unreasonable rates, causing the plaintiffs to pay bills that were too high and, in some cases, damaging their financial stability and credit ratings. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:01 am by Matthew T. Giardina
In March 2016, Plaintiffs declared that they had made all their payments as prescribed by their bankruptcy plan and requested that the bankruptcy court issue an order discharging their debts. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:26 pm
The court has also considered the remaining arguments of the plaintiff and finds them all without merit. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:09 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Indeed, Maryland swimming pool deaths account for nearly 400 fatalities each year and represent about 20% of all drowning deaths in the state. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:31 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
However, like all contracts, nursing home residents can challenge a contract that they signed without knowing what they were signing, claiming they never agreed to waive their right to sue. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
The fact that a plaintiff in the same situation as the Concepcions might choose not to make a claim for such a small overcharge is not the Court's concern, even if a class-action lawyer might be eager to bring the case on behalf of all similarly situated plaintiffs, but for the class-action waiver. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:49 am by Robert Kreisman
At the close of all evidence, the trial judge directed a verdict for plaintiff finding defendant was negligently operating her car at the time of the crash and that the defendant’s negligence was the cause of the crash, but denied plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict on liability. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:56 am by M. Scott McIntyre
  At the request of plaintiffs’ counsel, defense counsel clarified in writing that the offer included liquidated damages and applied to both the named plaintiffs and all opt-in plaintiffs. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 7:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is partly because defamation is a common-law and not a statutory concept, so that judges have made the rules over the years and also created exceptions to all the rules. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am by John Jascob
The defendants contended that Delaware law should apply to the plaintiff’s California Securities Act claim because the plaintiff waived its right to assert the claim by contractually agreeing with the contract that Delaware law would apply to all claims arising out of the contract, including statutory claims.Court determines California law should apply. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am by Ben
Consequently, the judge further ruled in Flo & Eddie's favour on all causes of action as it applied to public performance, but not to alleged reproduction copyright violations. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:27 pm by Howard Bashman
“ExxonMobil Argues Co-Defendant’s Settlement Barred Claims That Yielded $725M Benzene Verdict; The company asserted in a recent post-trial brief that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover against ExxonMobil at all because they had already been compensated by another defendant for their injuries”: Aleeza Furman of The Legal Intelligencer has this report. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:19 am by Erika Pickles
The plaintiffs also asked the court to: Require the EEOC and OMB to notify employers by April 12 that EEO-1 reporting obligations for the current reporting period will include pay data; and Require the EEOC to develop a plan to open pay data collection in advance of the May 31 deadline so that employers can submit all data simultaneously. [read post]