Search for: "Appeal of Hughes" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Ct of appeals found only marginally transformative. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you stay pristine, can’t be 12(b)(6), which happens in the Brownmark case where the court of appeals says, do it on the pleadings under 12(c) [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Doug Hughes was taken into custody, with possible charges pending. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:25 pm by Jeremy McCabe
Berkeley Professor Justin Hughes, Loyola University, Los Angeles [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
Though the logic is appealing, Lord Kerr’s analysis, unlike that of Lady Hale, does not challenge the majority’s narrow approach which considered children’s interests irrelevant to their parents’ rights if those interests were in some way ‘distinct’ [131]. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
 This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
fl=2014-1724.mp3In dissent, Judge Hughes wrote:The majority’s purely textual analysis cannot besquared with the overall legislative purpose of the AIAand § 18. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm by Grace Lee
Berkeley Professor Justin Hughes, Loyola University, Los Angeles [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
Applicant filed its notice of appeal six months after the final refusal was issued, and then two months later requested a remand to the Office for entry of a disclaimer of the word "motion," in order to moot that issue on appeal. [read post]
No-one else agreed with Lord Hughes’ speech, and his speech forms no part of the ratio of the case. [read post]