Search for: "Branch v. Mays" Results 1201 - 1220 of 6,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
  This was the case in Branches Neighborhood Corporation v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 12:41 pm by John Holtz
” Such expertise has always been one of the factors which may give an Executive Branch interpretation particular “power to persuade, if lacking power to control. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:11 am by tomwatts
By Tom Watts Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
  At issue in the case are the circumstances in which student loan debt may be discharged. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  If an attorney is a partner may he release a client. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:50 pm by WIMS
Simply put, the Judiciary may be the least dangerous branch, but it is not entirely toothless. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
As to the third statement, the Appellate Division said that the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of Eastwood’s CPLR 4404(a) motion to set aside so much of the verdict as was in favor of Eastwood with respect to the third statement.* See Sweeney v Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y., 84 NY2d 786** As relevant here, a motion by a party after a trial by jury to set aside all or part of the jury's verdict. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Accordingly, the Appellate Division rejected Educator’s appeal, explaining that in the event "the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists," a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the arbitrator.* See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, affirmed 30 NY2d 889.** In Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, the Court of Appeals held that when reviewing §3020-a compulsory… [read post]