Search for: "California v. Davis"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics was heard by Nicola Davies J on 23, 24 and 27 July 2018. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Pruitt (California-Davis) (below right). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Also, the Court has yet to set a Conference for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
The Fourth Circuit yesterday issued an en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
Association v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
The Fourth Circuit yesterday issued an en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Davis held that a criminal penalty for using a firearm during a "crime of violence" was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
” In Turner v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
IP Holdings v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
John Coyle (University of North Carolina School of Law) William Dodge (University of California, Davis School of Law) Aaron Simowitz (Willamette University College of Law) [This post is cross-posted at Transnational Litigation Blog] [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
The Court stressed that the Davis decision had found that statements made “in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objective [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
Facebook the Northern District of California has accepted that Facebook’s Terms of Service include valid a choice-of-law California law provision. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:12 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Brown v. [read post]
