Search for: "Clark v. Wells"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Judge Linn's lecture touched on this as well. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
Lady Justice Hallett, the next most senior woman in the court of appeal, is a candidate for lord chief justice when Lord Judge retires; her rivals are Lord Justice Leveson (if his inquiry goes well) and Sir John Thomas, president of the Queen’s Bench division. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future probably… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
The Judge accepted that Ms B intended to return tot he Highbury flat, but could not be sure quite when at the relevant time.The Judge then referred to Brown v Brash and Ambrose [1948] 2 KB 247 and Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes (1987) 20 HLR 108, and finished:It seems to me that these 2 cases are authority for the proposition that if Ms Boyle had an intention to return to Avenell Mansions at some time in the future – and I think that that time in the future probably… [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Addendum After writing this blog entry, I learned that Kim Jong Il died today, as well. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Stack, 997 F.2d 1356, 1363-68 (11th Cir. 1993) (Clark, J., dissenting) (navigability of river in mid-19th century); Naujalis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:35 am
Clark, and thus the “castle doctrine” doesn’t apply; the court also holds that the prosecution’s decision not to call the doctor who treated the victim’s knife wounds did not entitle the defense to a “missing witness” instruction… In State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
See Clark County Sch. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Law Think offered a commentary to the speech, and a useful document viewer document where you can find the blogger’s notes on some of the most important additions and changes made to the original speech, as well as commentary on specific passages of it. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
It seemed fairly clear the Court would establish that Sunbelt Rentals v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
On December 7, the Court will hear argument in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
It also appears the grant of (interlocutory) injunctions for patent infringement in Australia may well be increasingly influenced in the future by the sorts of issues highlighted by the US Supreme Court in KSR v Teleflex (although that case was not referred to). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
G.S. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
Private rightsholders can obtain injunctions against either foreign or domestic sites, but may only serve the resulting court orders on payment network providers and Internet advertisers as well as the owner, operator or registrant of the domain name – and only after the notification/counter-notification process has been completed. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Hill and Gertz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Senate v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:53 pm
Click here to see the Exhibits to the Universal v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm
In dicta, Justice Clark (writing for the majority) also said this: ‘In addition, it might well be said that one’s education is not complete without a study of comparative religion or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
Clarke (D-N.Y.), Rep. [read post]
