Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1201 - 1220 of 7,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:05 am by Rose Hughes
 Mr Justice Birss observed in Illumina v MGI that a limiting definition of a feature in the description, limits the scope of the claim. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
An English translation of that speech, well worth reading for its overtones to much of the global conversation about speech today, may be accessed HERE. 5. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:59 am by Roya Ghafele (OxFirst)
  These reflect the state of play of English law and also found their application in the Unwired Planet vs Huawei Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm by Apsosredesign
Following the Norman conquest in 1066, English common law was established. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hamilton Health Sciences, 2021 HRTO 213 (CanLII) [113] This Tribunal stated in Moore v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Mayela Celis
The latter provision states that jurisdiction over parental responsibility issues should be transferred to the courts where the child has acquired a new habitual residence and one of the alternative conditions set out in the said provision is satisfied (SS v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm by Barbara Moreno
Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America:  Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am by Cyberleagle
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm by David Kopel
State of Hawaii complements the Circuit's en banc from five years earlier, Peruta v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:33 am by Daniel Jin
An English order can be sought only in respect of matters that could and would be ordered in English proceedings. [read post]