Search for: "EVANS v. STATE" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Petrotech Resources Corp., 325 S.W.3d 302, 309 (Ky. 2010); Evans v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 4:06 pm by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
  The court then evaluated Justin’s situation using a list of factors from the 1998 case State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:33 am by Michael DelSignore
The judge next concluded that even if he were to reach the merits of the issue, he would have determined that the breathalyzer source code is scientifically reliable, in part relying on the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm by John Floyd
Just as in the December 2000 decision by the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Miller, The Identification of Fiduciary Relationships, (Evan J. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:00 pm
v=UODUzow514MVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 2:34 am by Afro Leo
  For attorneys working with the nuances of application proceedings in South Africa, the judge  re-affirmed that bare denials in affidavits are not sufficient to create disputes of fact under the Plascon-Evans rule. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:14 am by Bob Kraft
” The National Law Journal (10/13, Mauro) reports that David Frederick, a partner at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, is representing the family of Hannah Bruesewitz in the case, Bruesewitz v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division, citing the Court of Appeals ruling in Tolub v Evans, 58 NY2d 1, held that OCA’s action “does not offend due process,” because in matters concerning the State’s budget, “equal protection does not require that all classifications be made with mathematical precision. [read post]