Search for: "Favors v. USA"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
Compare Diamond v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:10 am
Update: USA v Mubayyid, September 1, 2011, 1st Cir. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm
Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-604) and Judicial Watch v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
John Fund v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Charlie Cray is a research specialist with Greenpeace USA and the director of the Center for Corporate Policy in Washington, DC. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:30 pm
Hart In Arcadia Development Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Nestle USA, Inc. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Nestle USA, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm
See In re Lisa Laser USA, Inc., 310 S.W.3d 880, 883 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding); Laibe Corp., 307 S.W.3d at 316. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:26 am
The United States Supreme Court recent decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
Rum production occurs throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, but it has been Cuban rum that has been the subject of decades'-long dispute, and two weeks ago, the subject a Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision in Pernod Ricard USA LLC v Bacardi USA, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
" Here's a bit more:The book is an outstanding example of a major trend in recent historical writing: looking beyond national boundaries in favor of Atlantic or transnational history. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
Arista Records v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Jivraj v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Jivraj v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Jivraj v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., 620 F.3d 1305, 1317 (Fed. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court concluded.The… [read post]
