Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 1201 - 1220 of 76,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Aiken was wrong to revive this case, and now the Ninth Circuit has killed it for good. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 The male conservatives also pretended that every potential future issue involving presidential immunity had to be worked out in this case, which is exactly the opposite position of the “good for one day” language and theme of Bush v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
Kneipp appealed to the Board of Appeal, which partially annulled the Opposition Division's decision insofar as it related to services in class 35 (marketing) but dismissed the appeal in respect of the other goods and services. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 4:34 pm by Paul Willetts
What comes to mind is the adage, ‘no good deed goes unpunished’. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
If you do, then you're good to go, and you get credit for all the classes you took in the interim before passing (e.g., your second and third year classes). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
You might think I have nothing good to say about David Egilman, but that is not true. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works  Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
 © Jocelyn BosseMarcel Pemsel evaluated the protection of short jingles as trade marks in light of the recent EUIPO Board of Appeal decision, which confirmed the rejection of Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe's application for a two-second long sound mark in class 39 (‘Transportation; passenger transport; packaging of goods; storage of goods; organization of trips’) due to lack of distinctiveness. [read post]