Search for: "Harris v. D "
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
You can have statutes that simply list elements (A + B + C = crime) or that have alternate ways of fulfilling the elements (A + B + C or D or E = crime). [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626 (1991) compelled a finding that no seizure had occurred. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:13 am
Harry Massanet Pastrana; Hon. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
The fate of three-time-relist Harris v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:25 pm
Wasserman, Howard Wasserman, Kamala D. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
(relisted after the June 20 Conference) Harris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
The déjà vu is palpable. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:20 am
Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
., Dole v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 8:18 pm
United States, waded back into Apprendi land to overrule the long-beleaguered Harris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States 11-9335Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
United States 11-9335Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
This seems to fly in the face the idea of presumption of innocent under section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[17] Although the idea of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at trial seems to help an accused, this is not the same standard that a prosecutor has to use in deciding whether to charge someone – the standard is lower: “reasonable prospects for conviction. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Harris, 12-885, a state-on-top habeas case from the Seventh Circuit, and Sims v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
AUTHOR: Harry J. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am
Harris of her right to effective counsel. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
We do this by not recognizing illness when there really isn't any.Remember the best selling self-help book from the 70's, I'm OK, You're OK, by Thomas A Harris MD? [read post]
