Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 7,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
HB 2311 makes several changes to the law regarding juveniles serving time in an adult jail including where certain juveniles can be housed and requiring a hearing at least every 30 days to determine the best interest of continuing to house a juvenile in an adult facility. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
” (Citing Tinsley v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 6:32 am
The police arrived and the bad guy exited the house. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:32 am
Some of these issues were highlighted in a recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision, Rooney v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:30 am
In Meyers v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
In the past several years, state legislatures across the country have passed laws designed to curb the rights of political protesters and increase their exposure to criminal penalties. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:26 pm
In Harm v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:26 pm
In Harm v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
On the other hand, in 1997, long before Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
"] From Doe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:40 pm
Officers arrived and ordered Cortesluna to come out of the house with his hands up. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
In Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:33 pm
King v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
UPDATE Ministerial Review Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
UPDATE Ministerial Review Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 11:42 am
” R v Proulx, 2000 SCC 5. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:56 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Babcock v Kijakazi will take the justices deep into the intersection of the Social Security Act and a host of statutes defining the obligations and compensation of National Guard workers. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
The Department of Agriculture is also slated to issue two reports to the White House Competition Council pursuant to the Executive Order. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
In my judgment the reasoning of the House of Lords in Fahia (R v Harrow LBC, ex p Fahia(1998) 1 WLR 1396, HL) provides no basis for that contention, nor did the Court of Appeal in Begum (R. v. [read post]
