Search for: "In re PHILLIPS" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 7:05 am by SOIssues
"The officers are held to the same standard as the public, and in most cases, we're held to an even higher standard, because the public perception is that we should always be above board and above the law. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am by Dan Bushell
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 611 F. 3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2010), that the Engle findings were res judicata only in the sense of establishing certain facts, not as establishing certain elements of a cause of action. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am by Dan Bushell
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 611 F. 3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2010), that the Engle findings were res judicata only in the sense of establishing certain facts, not as establishing certain elements of a cause of action. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Don't take our word for it, we're just reporting what we read on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and our iPad (which needs an 2.0 upgrade ASAP). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm by Charon QC
Criminal Law Special Sentencing in the wake of the riots and the forthcoming appeals Contempt of Court Troy Davis execution Legal Aid and Clause 12 re-visited Listen to the podcast *** I’d like to thank Lawtel, Westlaw,  Cassons For Counsel, City University Law School,  David Phillips & Partners Solicitors, Inksters Solicitors,  Iken, LBC Wise Counsel, Carrs Solicitors,  JMW Solicitors – Manchester, Pannone and Cellmark for sponsoring the… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Phillips precedent could have aided those claims.) [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am by Maxwell Kennerly
“Civil rights” is a tough area in which to practice law, if you’re representing the plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:16 pm by David Lat
I seriously hope these are psychiatrist bills; otherwise we’re dealing with an eggshell butt. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:31 am by Lovechilde
Judson Phillips, president of Tea Party Nation thinks voting should be limited to those who "own property. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Past Participating Chefs Host Chef Christian Clair The Ritz-Carlton, Fort Lauderdale Angelo Elia Casa D'Angelo Fort Lauderdale Farid Qualidi Trina, The Atlantic Hotel Fort Lauderdale Gordon Maybury Loew's Miami Beach Hotel Miami Dean Max 3030 Ocean Restaurant Fort Lauderdale Alexander Feher Hotel Intercontinental Miami Miami Phillip Pinon The Ritz Carlton, Coconut Grove Rafael Velasquez The W Hotel, Fort Lauderdale John Schupbach Casablanca Cafe, Fort Lauderdale … [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:43 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:00 am by DGVE law
  (OK, they're small and nowhere near enough to pay for college, but the good intention was there! [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) KF250 .F352 2010Legal WritingLegal writing / Richard K. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:48 pm by Rumpole
We don't like the Colts without Peyton.17) The Titans are re-building. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Blog); Professor Phillip Page (South Texas); etc. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:17 am by Juan Antunez
Long admits that the court never appointed her as the guardian of the property of her children, but she nevertheless claims that as their parent and natural guardian, under In re Estate of Phillips, 190 So.2d 15, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), she should have this power. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:44 am by Tim Eavenson
It gives me an excuse to congratulate my fellow employment law blogger, Phillip Miles of Lawffice Space on the birth of his baby girl! [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  In light several key court of appeals decisions prior to Dukes (including the Second Circuit in In re IPO Securities Litigation, the Third Circuit in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, and even the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Dukes itself), this analytical model is not groundbreaking, but Dukes puts an end to any possible reluctance by the federal courts to resolve an issue of fact simply because it might overlap with the merits. [read post]