Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 5,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a revocation appeal.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:Magnetic thin film interference device, showing a viewing-angle dependent color appearance, comprising a multi-layer stack including at least one light-reflecting reflector layer (3, 3’) selected from the group consisting of aluminum, aluminum alloy, chromium, silver and gold, at least one light-transmitting dielectric layer (2, 2’), at least one light absorbing absorber layer (1,… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am
Lobbyists would have to invest at least $1 million in a pooled Congressional incumbents’ campaign fund and prove how the lobbyist’s investment will create at least 10 jobs for US workers. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
Thus, the class action’s Section 10(b) claims failed as a matter of law. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
In the 2-1 decision in the D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
United States, 520 U.S. 1, 6 (1997). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:55 am
Claim amendment (including limitative) may no longer be accepted in the appeal phase. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§1–1–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
Texas Dep't of Protective and Regulatory Servs., No. 06-20673 "Summary judgment for various governmental entities and employees accused of performing unconstitutional child abuse investigations is affirmed where: 1) certain Fourth Amendment claims resulting from the seizures of plaintiffs' children failed because the exigent-circumstances doctrine applied; 2) where there were Fourth Amendment violations, individual defendants were entitled to qualified… [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Contrary to the opinion of the petitioner, the Board had no obligation to interpret a simple counter-argument made in the course of the discussion as a formal objection under Rule 106 EPC.10. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Contrary to the opinion of the petitioner, the Board had no obligation to interpret a simple counter-argument made in the course of the discussion as a formal objection under Rule 106 EPC.10. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:51 am
These rules stand to reason and are mandatory. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:11 am
In an initial examination, the examiner applies the broadest reasonable construction, and if claims are rejected, the applicant can amend them as a matter of right. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
The Court rejected Bay Area’s argument that the reclamation plan amendment EIR was inadequate — and violated CEQA’s rules against “segmentation” of a project (also known as “piecemealing”) – because it did not analyze the cumulative impact of the new quarry pit proposed in Lehigh’s earlier but withdrawn applications as a “reasonably foreseeable future project. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:20 am
Erotic dance is another matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:08 am
" On March 1, 2002, Business 2.0 Magazine reporter Owen Thomas asked, "Are you profitable? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
In fact, Rule 26(b)(1) describes the scope of allowable discovery as follows: ‛Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action… . [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
No. 1, at 6, 8.) [read post]
