Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 1201 - 1220 of 5,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 197 [Week ending 10 June] The IPKat is turning 15 ... and is inviting you to the birthday party! [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is a revocation appeal.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:Magnetic thin film interference device, showing a viewing-angle dependent color appearance, comprising a multi-layer stack including at least one light-reflecting reflector layer (3, 3’) selected from the group consisting of aluminum, aluminum alloy, chromium, silver and gold, at least one light-transmitting dielectric layer (2, 2’), at least one light absorbing absorber layer (1,… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Court rejected Bay Area’s argument that the reclamation plan amendment EIR was inadequate — and violated CEQA’s rules against “segmentation” of a project (also known as “piecemealing”) – because it did not analyze the cumulative impact of the new quarry pit proposed in Lehigh’s earlier but withdrawn applications as a “reasonably foreseeable future project. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
In fact, Rule 26(b)(1) describes the scope of allowable discovery as follows: ‛Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action… . [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am by Nico Cordes
Contrary to the opinion of the petitioner, the Board had no obligation to interpret a simple counter-argument made in the course of the discussion as a formal objection under Rule 106 EPC.10. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am by Nico Cordes
Contrary to the opinion of the petitioner, the Board had no obligation to interpret a simple counter-argument made in the course of the discussion as a formal objection under Rule 106 EPC.10. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The North Dakota legislature also queued up a personhood amendment, which says that life begins at conception for all purposes; that proposed amendment to the North Dakota Constitution will go to the state’s voters in November 2013. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors was heard on 10 October 2018. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Again, the plaintiffs in defamation proceedings sought an injunction pursuant to section 33 of the 2009 Act, but then referred to Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) which is an application of the rule in Bonnard v Perryman. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
Here, Gary Hill filed a motion under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in which he claimed the federal court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:20 am
They have have been set forth and discussed in detail, with specific reference to other tribunals’ rules and procedures for point of comparison, in a 10-page letter that Rapp sent the Bangladesh government, as well as in letters by Human Rights and other international organizations. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This item appears related to the rulemaking addressed in the SEC’s most recent Reg Flex agenda, which stated that the Division of Corporation Finance “is considering recommending that the Commission propose rule amendments to address certain advisors’ reliance on the proxy solicitation exemptions in Rule 14a-2(b). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Kelly Goles
These constitutions, if not already providing for them, are to include provisions on the nation’s legislative process, complete with conflict-of-interest rules, amendment procedures, and appeal mechanisms (Anishinabek Nation Governance Agreement Plain Language Version, Chapter 5). [read post]