Search for: "League v. League"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Major League Baseball Properties et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Major League Baseball Properties et al. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
See Klumpp v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:56 pm
A little unpublished per curiam opinion from the Eighth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:03 am
The voucher will be redeemable at any store in PNC Park, the home of Major League Baseball’s Pittsburgh Pirates. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:34 am
Similarly, in the CJEU case of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure concluded that football matches themselves are not protected by copyright; US law has a similar result in NBA v Motorola. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:28 am
Business Week previews American Needle Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:26 am
Thus, in New York v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
A number of the briefs highlighted the recent Wolk v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 11:14 am
These similarities are evidenced in the recent decision, Dimry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:25 pm
On Monday, the Court heard among others an appeal in The League of Women Voters of Florida, et al., v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 2:09 pm
See here.... [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:01 pm
Just following up on a new decision that was originally posted back on February 8th from Idaho. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:29 pm
As it turns out, the closest which should could get was the sports broadcast saga involving Australian football codes and rival telecommunications companies: National Rugby League Investments Pty Limited v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 59 (27 April 2012). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:59 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-3270; and The Football Association Premier League Ltd et al v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
The difference is a causal one of action v. omission. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
Today’s coverage of the Court focuses on the myriad amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
