Search for: "Little v. Williams" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am by Mark Walsh
Fenves, who took over as president of UT-Austin this past June, succeeding William C. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
Chief Douglas indicated that he wanted to see the video, so Marsh played `just a little bit . . . possibly a minute’ of the video.State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
  Rory Little previewed Mussachio v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
 He also reviewed Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare: The Quest for Humanity in Conflict, by Stephanie Carvin and Michael John Williams. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
It took a three year legal battle, with the Clinic not only acting pro bono in protecting NautiGirl's mark but also in setting a precedent for future cases where big businesses try to bulldozer startups with little cause. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the volume of information presented, however, relatively little is known about the circumstances of the abuse to which plaintiffs were subjected. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
Sources [1] Bikram’s Yoga Coll. of India, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
The case, said the judge in the case management conference, would depend on whether it would be possible to establish that there had been copying: copying might be complete and identical [as in Art & Allposters, discussed by Tom Ohta on the IPKat here], "exact" or "altered / inexact", as in Designers Guild v Russell Williams, here. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
It was very often far cheaper and easier, and also much quicker, to pay infringers to help change their products, brands, business cards and so on than to go to court and get a judgment – and they sometimes earned a little kudos by so doing. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Lasker,“Defending Daubert: It’s Time to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702,” 57 William & Mary L. [read post]