Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 1201 - 1220 of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 4:47 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Darren
The Principles- Likelihood of ConfusionAs summarised by the UKIPO, are as follows: (a) the likelihood of confusion must be appreciated globally, taking account of all relevant factors; (b) the matter must be judged through the eyes of the average consumer of the goods/ services in question; who is deemed to be reasonably well informed and reasonably circumspect and observant - but who rarely has the chance to make direct comparisons between marks and must instead rely upon the… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Schachtman
California, Berkeley School of Law) (Slides); William C. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
The matter came before Foster J again on 7 February 2012: SL6 Limited v Fat Duck Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 71 (7 February 2012). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
Scalia concurring), held that although the Bankruptcy Court had statutory authority to enter judgment on the counterclaim under § 157(b)(2)(C), it lacked constitutional authority to do so. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
"Now, Sasha (not her real name) is simply wrong, as a matter of law; her pitchfork won't penetrate the automatic stay. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:33 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  However, the recent unpublished (non-precedential) decision of In the Matter of the Estate of James J. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]