Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 55,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
"Haymond seemingly to become major Apprendi progeny altering federal supervised release revocations"
27 Feb 2019, 2:50 pm
Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law & Policy, focusing on the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 3:57 am
In Gertz v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 3:09 pm
” So begins Judge Stranch’s dissent in the Sixth Circuit’s recent unpublished decision in Ram International, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:43 pm
Yesterday, the Missouri Supreme Court in Watts v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
See Noble v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:33 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision today in Fundy Settlement v. [read post]
23 May 2006, 12:49 am
Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:08 pm
In the first of these two cases, James v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
[1] Sackett v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:24 pm
” The majority essentially adoptsSilver Spring’s construction, and in particular the finalclause requiring that the device be “designed to operatewithout a fixed location. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
Key Points from the Majority Opinion Section 230 Should Be Read Broadly. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
The recent Missouri Court of Appeals case of Major v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
In this split decision the majority indicates that U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
(Eugene Volokh) As I blogged a few months ago, a two-judge majority on a Sixth Circuit panel held in Defoe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
This Term the Justices will decide a major campaign finance regulation case (McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 10:18 am
” The en banc majority rejects this argument and overrules Wanat, Will Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:48 pm
D.O. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
As Heather pointed out, if you read Scalia's dissent in Craig, it really reads like the Crawford majority opinion--the reasoning of the Craig majority is really based on Ohio v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:33 am
In Stark v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 6:10 am
Nothing major, but it does look like the case management conference was conducted on Sep. 14, and the claim construction hearing, i.e., Markman hearing, has been set for June 8, 2010:Minute Entry: Initial Case Management Conference held on 9/14/2009 before Hon. [read post]
