Search for: "No. 337" Results 1201 - 1220 of 4,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 6:30 am by Eric Schweibenz
No. 337-TA-692) denying Respondents Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electro-Mechanics America, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 2:00 am by Sherica Celine
International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation from start to finish with this key deadlines chart for Section 337 investigations. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:42 am by Phil
Unlike the wave of smartphone and mechanical-based technology proceedings currently before the Commission, innovator pharmaceutical-based Section 337 investigations have only constituted about 2.5% of all investigations instituted since 1976. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:53 pm by Eric Schweibenz
’s (“Google”) motion to intervene, but denying a motion to disqualify the law firm of Pepper Hamilton LLC (“Pepper Hamilton”) in Certain Portable Communication Devices (337-TA-827). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We therefore disagree with the dissent’s per se rule that “patent infringement litigation is an investment in the exploitation of a patent” within the meaning of section 337(a)(3)(C). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
— all of Santa Clara, California — and Index Systems, Inc. of the British Virgin Islands (collectively, “Rovi”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]