Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1201 - 1220 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am by Richard Hunt
This brings us to Judge Sannes’ opinion in Clover  Communities. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm by NCC Staff
Russo (2020), both of which argued that the Supreme Court’s abortion standards under Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm by Alan Alexandroff
  Richard Gardiner, however, points out that “titles are often too general to provide precise guidance. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:30 pm by Ronald Mann
Little noticed before the graceful display of collegial disagreement in the announcements of McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
 This "divorced from the circumstances" standard makes no sense to me.That's true even when one uses Justice Corrigan's hypothetical. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:40 pm
  Of course, only empirical research could ascertain what impact, if any, the ability to contract for an expanded standard of review would have on the level of use of arbitration. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is not the occasion to define more precisely what standard should govern pretext claims based on superior qualifications. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:35 pm by Andrew Crocker
The court agreed with our argument precisely:  [I]n terms of reasonable expectation of privacy, the salient consideration is the length of time for which a person's CSLI is requested, not the time covered by the person's CSLI that the Commonwealth ultimately seeks to use as evidence at trial. . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
We determined that it does not meet fair use standards and that it constitutes copyright infringement. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” This is, in fact, precisely how Justice Alito’s opinion in Brnovich v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
The Ninth Circuit just handed down a partial victory for the NCAA in its antitrust case, O’Bannon v. [read post]