Search for: "Parker v. Parker."
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 6:40 am
Parker (D. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
Parker for Lamon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:52 pm
Parker for Lamon v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:48 am
He loses.The case is Rosu v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:23 pm
T.S. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:11 pm
Other cases of note include: - Parker v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
A 1978, Dallas Court of Appeals case styled Republic Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
If there is a reason to protect official state agencies, one possible reason could be that (given Parker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Initially, Parker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:16 am
In a decision decided last month, the California Court of Appeals for the First District, in Palagin v. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] How a state dentistry board hounded non-dentist teeth-whiteners out of North Carolina
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Yesterday, I wrote about the doctrine that “state action” is immune from federal antitrust law, a doctrine that dates back to the Parker v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
But when a state legislature regulates its economy in an anticompetitive way, it’s exempt from antitrust law: in Parker v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
An earlier iteration of the case was GVR’d and returned to the Sixth Circuit in light of the Court’s per curiam decision in Parker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm
Parker—which held that a legislature’s acts are “well-nigh conclusive” of constitutionality—and Williamson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
As 2013 came to a close, the California court of appeal in Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:57 am
The style of the case is, May v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Case Name: JOY KLOMLIAM v. [read post]