Search for: "People v Childs"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 7,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
See Lopez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
On June 22, the Court also decided People v Henix, No 144531. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:00 pm
Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
He entered the UK as a student and is the primary carer for his British citizen child. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:15 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights)Roy S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
Children & Young People Now report that “Social work leaders criticise landmark child protection ruling“, that ruling being the decision of the President in Re J (A Child) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
That point came and went in the Roscommon case–just as it did in Z v United Kingdom–without an appropriate response from child protection services. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Many people assume a criminal case ends upon conviction and sentencing. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm
One such case is the matter of Abbott v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm
Waites v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
S v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
In Mason v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
We're targets because people envy our freedom, terrorism is but a form of bloody jealousy. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:01 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
