Search for: "People v Davis"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2012, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
Music is a performing art: people buy tickets to see musicians. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:10 am
Between the lines, however, Davis' point is not only clear, but quite understandable. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Amidst all the pain surrounding desegregation in Arkansas, Roberts lionized Davies, noting that he “missed his own son’s wedding to see through his charge to follow the law. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 3:48 am
The bulk of the court’s decision turned on whether UMW “exercise[d] substantial control over both the harasser and the context in which the known harassment occurs,” as required to establish Title IX liability under the Supreme Court’s 1999 decision in Davis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:35 am
Accordingly, this is not a situation, as in Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:26 am
In Moyle v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am
Supreme Court decision does nothing to stop state-based, citizen-led efforts to give map-drawing power to the people. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
Wendy Davis piles on [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
Davis, 237 N.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Supreme Court's 1993 ruling in Herrera v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:02 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
Merrill and Title 15 Section 1692 that when people enter into any dealings with agents, the people better investigate the authority and limits of authority that the agents possess. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But wisdom was in short supply in Jefferson Davis’s cabinet. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
The Relationships between Speech and Conduct, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49, 2016, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 16-16, Jane R. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
