Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 10:10 pm
It has long been debated (see the previous blog posts by Peter Oldham QC and Ed Capewell covering the 2010 decisions of the Supreme Court in A v Essex CC and JR 17) whether the content of the right which A2P1 protects is fixed by reference to the standard of education guaranteed by law in the domestic legal system or, rather, is restricted to some (lower) objective minimum standard. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm
The recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:25 am
Peter F. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:47 pm
Does this person have the reported fetish? [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
The New York Times on March 29, 2012 released the following: "BY PETER J. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
The New York Times on March 29, 2012 released the following: "BY PETER J. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:37 pm
The circumstances, he considered, may well arise where alternative accommodation is offered that does not carry the right to buy (para 47). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
Peter Sherwood discusses privity, professional negligence and the interplay of tort and contract. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
(Peter Mensch v Louise Mensch, NYSCEF index no. 309381/2017.) [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:40 am
,AAA Case No. 17-15-1021-8978 (4/15/16) (Gary Peters, Arb.)Arbitrator Peters addressed whether respondent established its defense based upon fraudulent procurement of the policy. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
The First Circuit had long followed the Fourth Circuit’s 1985 ruling in Lubrizol Enterprises v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 7:33 am
VAS Aero Servs., LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(patents4life) (IPKat) Michael Punke nominates as WTO Ambassador (Intellectual Property Watch) Disney acquires Marvel – IP contention ensues (Copyfight) (IP finance) US Patent Reform Mike Drummon, Editor-in-Chief of Inventors Digest Magazine, joins innovators for patent reform (IP Watchdog) US Patents Litigation rumours surface over Intellectual Ventures - Picture Frame Innovations, LLC v Eastman Kodak Company et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Without further ado, here are our top ten most-read posts of 2023: CJEU Strips it Down for OnlyFans (C-695/20 Fenix International v HMRC) By Emilia Cole Oceans Apart: The EU and US Cybersecurity Certification Standards for Cloud Services By Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire and Josh Fox The Data Act: a (slippery) third way beyond personal/non-personal data dualism? [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:15 am
See Corwin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
Peter Bowal, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, What if the stud does not function? [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
Does it consistently protect a lawyer’s professional independence? [read post]
