Search for: "RICHARDS v. RICHARDS"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 13,653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 12:49 pm
A review of Richard L. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am
On 7/24/1974, the Supreme Court would decide U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:05 pm
On average, in our sample, GPs report internal rates of return (IRRs) that are over 8 percentage points higher than IRRs reported by LPs (15.1 percent v. 7.0 percent). [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
”[1] Chair Lina Khan has previously voiced her support for doing so.[2] My view is that the Commission has no such rulemaking powers, and that the scope of the authority asserted would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power by the Congress.[3] Others have written about those issues, and we can leave them for another day.[4] Professors Richard Pierce and Gus Hurwitz have each written that, if FTC rulemaking is to survive judicial scrutiny, it must apply to conduct that is… [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:05 pm
In one of the most famous cases in corporate law, Paramount Communications v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 11:03 am
By Richard Storrow (May 4, 2022) In a widely anticipated move, the United States Supreme Court has voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:15 am
Wade,' said Richard L. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:22 am
Charles retained the defendant Richard Slagle, a Connecticut attorney, to represent Jeanne. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:45 pm
This article illustrates its thesis with reference to the example of State v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:01 pm
They invoke AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
But, of course, Richard Nixon named four justices in his truncated years in office and Donald Trump three. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:24 am
From Mercer v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
For my presentation, I focused on 1973’s National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
Antitrust scholars have long argued, and many courts have adopted the view, that “false positive” costs should be weighted more heavily relative to “false negative” error costs, principally on the ground that, as Judge Richard Posner once put it, “a cartel . . . carries within it the seeds of its own destruction. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:59 am
MOISE v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Since Employment Division v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
See also the related post we published today from Richard J. [read post]
