Search for: "Self v State" Results 1201 - 1220 of 14,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm by Unknown
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (State Court Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Nguyen v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pirani v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Rader self-cited:Perhaps most importantly, the remedy for inequitable conduct is the “atomic bomb” of patent law. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
Dept. of Interior (disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:Native Village of Tununak v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:54 am by Grace Capel
The Supreme Court begins a two-day hearing in the high-profile case of Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority today. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:12 pm by Record on Appeal
  Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Faragher v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:24 am
Before I get too self-congratulatory I should note that it's just a hearing and to my knowledge no precise action has been proposed.Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, Patrick Leahy (D-VT), issued a statement expressly stating that the hearing will focus on Gross (and Circuit City v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
For example, in his argument to the Court in United States v. [read post]