Search for: "State v. Brothers"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2022, 8:56 pm
Culver v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:18 am
Palin also endorsed the brother's opponent. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 3:27 am
Such was the case in Blue Equity Holdings Kentucky, LLC v Cobalt Riverfront Properties, LLC, No. 2018-CA-001092-MR [Ky Ct App Aug. 30, 2019], in which a parking lot in downtown Louisville, Kentucky was the setting for a ruling by that state’s Court of Appeals in a judicial dissolution proceeding requiring it to construe the purpose clause of an LLC agreement. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 4:50 am
Peculiar Risk Doctrine/Premises Liability—Application of Privette Doctrine—Retained Control Exception—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court, held that hirers of independent contractor were entitled to summary… Brothers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
State of Maryland). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:32 pm
But in Castillo v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
I think that the interpretations being offered of Article V make an already dreadful article even worse. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Purcell, New York Law School, looks back to Charles Evans Hughes's Supreme Court of the United States for inspiration on how Chief Justices can induce the resignations of Associate Justices (The Hill).Barbara Lauriat, Texas Tech University School of Law, has published Robinson & Roberts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:43 am
While exposure of official police misconduct is "generally of great consequence to the public," the Second Circuit has also stated that "no authority supports the argument that reporting an alleged crime always implicates a matter of public concern," such in Nagle v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:06 pm
Case Name: Blakely v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
Two more states held Alabama v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:16 pm
Manuel James Barbosa, the defendant in Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
In Cottrell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am
The court rejected the brother’s expert deduction of about $1.45 million for built-in gains tax, finding no evidence that the brother planned to sell the farming operation. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:07 am
Click here to read the suit, Lyttle v. [read post]
