Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 14,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Throughout the time of this trial, the Petitioner revealed his theory of defense through cross examination of each witness called by the State. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:08 pm
The State of Illinois will likely argue that it is overly burdensome and expensive to require everyone that produced a report to testify, when the veracity of the report can still be challenged by the defense team through its own expert or through cross-examination of the expert that relied upon the report. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:27 pm
The court rejected "Baldwin's 'had-my-fingers-crossed' argument because what counts is not what she believed about her stated intent but what the decision maker at Blue Cross believed". [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:56 am
State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:02 am
Federal Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:42 am
Like its federal counterpart, Maryland Rule of Evidence 5-704(b) states that An expert witness testifying with respect to the mental state or condition of a defendant in a criminal case may not state an opinion or inference as to whether... [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
by Dennis Crouch United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:36 pm
From today's decision in Eknes-Tucker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
(His move was a “cross-border” element.) [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
Many other states, including California, Nebraska, Illinois, and Florida, have similar statutes. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Grace v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:15 am
Background The M/V Majesty was carrying 25,000 mt of rice under a voyage charterparty on an amended Synacomex 90 form. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:40 am
Bowley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:28 pm
County of Hawaii, 91 Haw. 94, 979 P.2d 1120 (1999); as did the construction of a sewage pipe, a portion of which would cross beneath a state road. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:24 pm
Moeller v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:57 pm
CPLR Section 217 states that an Article 78 proceeding to challenge an administrative decision must be commenced within four months after the determination becomes final. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:38 am
") AC35406 - Rodriguez v. [read post]
