Search for: "State v. Fields"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 11,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
"In addition, the Appellate Division observed that Supreme Court "correctly noted" that a local government may not legislate in areas "where the State has evidenced its intent to occupy the field" and it is well established that the State has preempted local action in the field of public education. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm
The Double Quick v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm
He added that one way to ensure that only the guilty are convicted is to uphold the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
Although such Final Rules were widely criticized by most companies in the United States, a sole individual, Dr. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:51 am
Intellectual property as a legal academic field has evolved through three stages. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Most books in this field have little or no material on the latter two topics. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:39 am
§ 41713(b)(1)) that “prohibits states from enforcing any law ‘relating to rates, routes, or services’ of any air carrier,” Morales v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:16 am
In the case, Lawson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
This 55-page opinion from the Ninth Circuit tells you probably more than you would ever want to know about soybean farming (and cotton farming) in the United States -- and, in particular, (1) how we get rid of weeds in modern farming, and (2) just how dependent we are on both (a) Round-Up and its follow-on chemicals (here, dicamba) and (b) genetically modified seeds that protect crops against such chemicals. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Youngblood v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 5:55 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:00 pm
In Abrasic 90 Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:30 am
See Benitec Austl., Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Because “benefits tourism” and the burden on the state must be reduced, like Arden LJ it was “impossible” for Lord Carnwath to hold that the objectives underpinning the regulations fell outside the wide margin of discretion allowed to national governments in this field. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
The brief begins:Fisher v. [read post]
