Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issues raised in our current list include district courts’ ability to amend incorrect sentences, the constitutionality of appointments to a patent appeals board, the validity of the “automatic companion” rule under the Fourth Amendment, the statute of limitations in securities fraud claims, whether state criminal convictions require jury unanimity, and many (many, many) others. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
May 23, 2008) (indemnification for non-merits dismissal of federal civil action granted prior to resolution of related state court action), where the courts emphasized the important role of indemnification in securing qualified persons to serve on corporate boards. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) Division of Enforcement continued to focus on cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (“AI”) disclosures. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
China then began rejecting all corn from the United States containing the MIR 162 trait, which persisted for over a year. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced fraud charges against 27 individuals and entities, including three public companies, seven stock promotion firms, and two corporate CEOs, alleging that they engaged in stock promotion schemes that disguised promotional materials as unbiased analyses intended to mislead potential investors. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
State of Ohio Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0737n.06 Heartwood v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
J. 389***Christopher V. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/5vG Cash v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
The case of Caremark, a US corporation, is solid law in the state of Delaware and a highly influential decision in the area of corporate governance in other jurisdictions as well. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
If corporate counsel disclosed confidences at will, the attorney-client relationship as a whole would be greatly damaged…. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
If you have read Part I, you are familiar with the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
Supreme Court’s February 21, 2018 decision in the Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of a lessee’s ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of… [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
As Judge Levin pointed in Morefield v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:07 am
Lowinger v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
Automatic stay(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of—(1) the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been… [read post]
