Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 10:11 am
Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272, 1283 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:05 pm
Tuesday’s second case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
" Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1314; see Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
Phillips, who often epresents the Chamber, has said that “except for the solicitor general representing the United States, no single entity has more influence on what cases the Supreme Court decides and how it decides them than the [Chamber’s] National Chamber Litigation Center. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:20 pm
FEC, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:49 pm
He ruled that the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
Phillips v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Phillips and Nationwide Ins. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:03 pm
v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
See Phillips v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
As Annsley explains in this post, that litigation started back in 2012 and focuses on an exciting Rovi's patent - European Patent (UK) No 0, 862,833 - which relates to interactive video communications and viewer-controlled selection of programming information.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Phillip E. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
Phillips of the Central of District California, based in Riverside, in the 86-page opinion issued yesterday in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:29 am
Phillips v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:29 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
States Power Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Brantley Phillips Jr. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
