Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 2,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
After reviewing the state's Oil, Gas & Solution Mining Law (OGSML) Judge Phillip R. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:30 am
I came across a paper by Jeffrey Lax and Justin Phillips, "Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness," published recently in the American Political Science Review. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1316. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:53 pm
At that point, the patentee voluntarily dismissed the patent claim in order to to fight a state-court battle over patent ownership, which then became more complicated when Gamo purchased Phillips purported interest and intervened in the state court action. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:24 pm
The opinion, by Pooler, also stated that it doubted the FCC would be able to justify the opinion under the First Amendment. [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:25 am
LEXIS 46323 (ED CA, April 9, 2010), a California federal district court held plaintiff's charge that prison officials harassed him about his dreadlocks did not state a free exercise claim.In Tapp v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:18 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Lok Mabbitt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Phillips v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
See Phillip Morris, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:41 pm
This latest features Cate Blanchett at the moment of threats to her by the Catholic Monarchy of Phillip II. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
PHILLIPS, M.D. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:41 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
In the decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:33 am
The Kentucky Supreme Court order in Conway v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
Perhaps the most significant criminal case in our collection was United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
MARUSICH v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Sismer 35 AD3d 1054, 1056; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon 172 AD2d 254). [read post]
