Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 1201 - 1220
of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 3:32 pm
How is not stated. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 1:59 am
Such a situation arose recently in the case of SC v TC [2022] EWFC67. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:35 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
The publisher was awarded £20,000, while editor-in-chief of Tariq Al-Homayed received £30,000 and senior journalist Maad Fayad £35,000. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm
Russel Covington, et al v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:24 am
” “Global law firm Clyde & Co was last year fined 500,000 pounds after admitting multiple breaches of money laundering regulations relating to a long-standing client. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
The basic point is that the eligible amount for housing benefit is reduced by the excess over either £350 or £500pw (for singles and others respectively). [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
In the remedies hearing, Knowles J awarded the claimant £95,000 in damages, including aggravated damages and ordered the website operator to remove the offending part of the article. 5RB summarised the judgement. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm
IPSO took six months to rule on the matter, during which time a case officer became so concerned about Hindley’s mental state that she sent her contact details for the Samaritans. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
This is what Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd tried to achieve recently – Ms Podlasiak’s employment contract with the company stated that she would only be entitled to £1 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday as at the date of termination. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
The claim was settled in January 2007 on terms that Mr H would vacate by 1 June 2007 and Mrs B would pay him £16,000 and £4,000 costs. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
The claim was settled in January 2007 on terms that Mr H would vacate by 1 June 2007 and Mrs B would pay him £16,000 and £4,000 costs. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The claimants received £500 each by way of compensation. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:00 am
In his Award, the Adjudicator inserted the wrong number for the gross value of the Contract, namely of £9,376,220.72. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:09 pm
The decision in Campbell v MGN The facts of Campbell are well known. [read post]
