Search for: "The James Wells v. United States" Results 1201 - 1220 of 2,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(See, e.g, James Darsey, The Prophetic Tradition and Radical Rhetoric in America, 1999).I’m Not a Bigot, By God! [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
Rodney Davis, John Katko), and James Comer have introduced a bill that would establish a national bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The stated purpose of an article 10 proceeding is Ato help protect children from injury or mistreatment and to help safeguard their physical, mental, and emotional well‑being. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm by Eric
Perhaps rebordering the Internet is inevitable, but it's bad policy for the United States to be cutting off transborder data flows, even for the putatively noble purpose of suppressing copyright infringement. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben also contrasted Donald Trump’s latest proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States with Mai El-Sadany’s piece on being an American Muslim these days. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:15 am by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued the Initial Determination (“ID”) finding that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Reuters writes that Turkey has asked that the United States and Russia to intervene in Manbij as Turkish-backed rebels clash with U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm by Yishai Schwartz
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]