Search for: "*long v. U. S"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2023, 12:40 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Stephen S., supra at 947; Matter of Canazon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:49 am
McCoy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
Nebraska, 164 U. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
In opposition, plaintiffs, as assignees "stand[ing] in the shoes" of their assignor (see Long Is. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 4:20 am
A recent decision from New York County, Mavridakis v Litvack, 2024 NY Slip Op. 33971[U], suggests otherwise. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States 15-9260 Issues: Whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Pepper v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
[Second,] [u]pon such a showing, a court may order discovery and hold a hearing to determine the supporting spouse’s ability to pay. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:47 am
In Access Point Med., LLC v Mandell ; 2011 NY Slip Op 30866(U); April 8, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 102082/2010; Judith J. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
Supreme Court, arguing that the appeals court’s ruling ran directly opposite to the high court’s previous decision in a 2007 home care worker’s wage-and-hour case, Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Enjaian's claim against Sergeant Dorta will be dismissed without prejudice.Enjaian v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Bureau, 591 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:34 am
S. 83 (1963) and Giglio v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:13 am
At that point, Harmon saw her raise her arms in such a way that he thought she had a long gun, so he turned and started running back into his house. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:43 pm
Then, in Florida v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am
That’s where the US Air Force Medium Altitude, Long Endurance, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) RQ-1 Predator from Maisto comes in. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 am
Hall, 466 U. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:25 am
In Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
New Prime Inc. v. [read post]