Search for: "Application of State of California" Results 1221 - 1240 of 18,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 6:08 am
Thanks to How Appealing, I discovered this interesting ruling from one of California's Courts of Appeal concerning a state marijuana prosecution. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:11 am by Michael R. Guerrero
  The DFPI also, as a matter of state law, can now enforce the Dodd-Frank Act’s UDAAP provisions against any person offering or providing consumer financial products or services in the state, notwithstanding the CCFPL’s applicability to such persons. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 5:31 pm by Mary Anne Peck
The October 17 story , by Stacy Thomas, quotes a representative of the California Chamber of Commerce who bemoaned the law’s “one-size-fits-all” approach and said public and private employers in California should be “very concerned” about the law because it applies the high standards that are already applicable to the health care industry—which is known to have lots of workplace violence issues—“to even the smallest employer… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:57 am by Joe Liburt
The hashtag #TakeTheLead emerged as a symbol reflecting California’s potential to become the state at the forefront of passing additional legislation characterized as increasing protection for women – and workers generally – in the face of the #MeToo movement. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 3:00 am
California State Water Resources Control Board, turned on two issues:  the unequal application of the fee (only 40% of the water users were being taxed) and the lack of direct application of the fee charged by the government to the benefit provided by the government. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
It has been a couple of years since California enacted a statute requiring listed companies headquartered in the Golden State to have women on their boards. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:56 am by Lara A. Levine and Colleen Regan
Protected employees include members of the reserve corps of the armed forces of the United States, the National Guard or the naval militia, and members of the California State Military Reserve. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:16 pm by Lindsey Tonsager and Libbie Canter
Last week, after months of negotiation and speculation, the California legislature passed bills amending the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:19 pm by John Caiozzo
Connect with an experienced California dog bite lawyer and you’ll find the state’s dog bite law unexpectedly does not protect other dogs from harm. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm by Jason Shinn
  In response to this increase some states, including California, Illinois, and Maryland, have proposed legislation to ban such conduct. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:57 pm by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Effective September 30, 2014, New Hampshire joins sixteen other states (Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Oklahoma, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin) in prohibiting employers from requiring employees or job applicants to disclose their login information for accessing any “personal account” or service through an electronic communication device. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:15 am
In fact, the plaintiff brought his claims under the state-securities laws of  Massachusetts, Colorado, Illinois, and California. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 6:52 pm by Mike
FCRA preempts most state laws relating to the duties of persons who furnish information to CRAs, but expressly exempts from preemption claims under California Civil Code Section 1785.25(a). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 9:20 am by Jillian A. Centanni
Furthermore, the USPTO will provide an online application portal including an application, invention disclosure form, online seminar, and a searchable list of programs in various states. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:27 am by Barbra Williams Diallo
Therefore, if the bill is signed into law, employers should include an express provision in their arbitration agreements that states that it is not required for employment. [read post]