Search for: "BLACK v. MAY." Results 1221 - 1240 of 7,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
(And we don't yet know if there will be an appeal, so this may not be the final word from the Oregon Courts.)Oregon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2006, 10:00 am
Recall the 2002 Ninth Circuit decision that First Amendment rights of physicians meant the federal government couldn't revoke the drug licenses of California physicians who recommended marijuana to their patients (Conant v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic (but not distinctive) London black cabMr Justice Arnold addresses the issue of whether the iconic London cab can be a trade mark in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:12 pm
Because he believes quick and easy access may unfairly harm reputations (e.g., a potential employer may view the mere existence of a lawsuit as a black mark against a job applicant). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 8:46 am by Russell Knight
This rule is contrary to the holding of the appellate court in Coons v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
  After all, the APL case may have arisen out of benzene exposure and the unknown causes, or only the unknown (idiopathic) causes. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:13 pm by James Fox
  Note, however, that while there may be agreement that the statute was wrong, the reasons for why it was wrong may vary quite a bit (as is true of anti-canon cases). [read post]