Search for: "Commitment of J F" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
Generally, the JCTC and JRTC are available for up to 15 years, although the term may differ at the discretion of the Ohio Department of Development. 20 Recipients must be careful, however, as the state is permitted to reclaim, or "clawback," all or a portion of the claimed credits if the taxpayer fails to fulfill its commitments for the project, such as if the project is abandoned prior to the end of the credit term or the required number of jobs is not created or maintained. 21 … [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am by Stephen Page
  The new definition will remove uncertainty about knowing the elements of an offence and whether an offence has been committed…The meaning of neglect is not defined and therefore takes its ordinary meaning. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  The State could have appealed it under JuvR 22(F), the counterpart to CrimR 12(J), which allows an interlocutory appeal where the granting of a motion to suppress or in limine has essentially eliminated “any reasonable possibility of effective prosecution. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix.
It declined to follow Mitting J in SS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/56/2009, 30 July 2010) that the observations in KJ were per incuriam. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
  He was not, however, above adopting views in such a way as to balance out his commitments to both the plaintiffs’ and defense bars. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
[filed May 4, 2012]IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION,Plaintiffs, v.UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,Defendants. ))))) Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00243-) RLW) (J udge Robert L. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
In his High Court ruling, however, Beatson J found in favour of the claimant’s Article 10 Rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:15 am by Tessa Shepperson
” to be met with an astonished and angry “F**k that, they’re SWP not Militant. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am by Karwan Eskerie
By virtue of its unlawfulness under domestic law, the detention also amounted to an arbitrary interference with HA’s right to liberty and was therefore incompatible with Article 5(1)(f) (persons held for the purposes of deportation) of the Human Rights Convention. [read post]