Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 1221 - 1240 of 12,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 3:42 pm
THE $1.7 BILLION PAYMENT There are several possible approaches for an RDA to consider with respect to the voluntary payment under ABX1-27: 1. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Thirty-two states are acting to pass laws or regulations to require sales tax collection by remote sellers now or in the immediate future: Preexisting prior to Wayfair: Pennsylvania & Rhode Island (both give retailers a choice between collecting tax or complying with notice-and-reporting laws) July 1, 2018: Colorado (notice-and-reporting only), Hawaii, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont September 1, 2018: Mississippi October 1, 2018: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the requirement of Rule 27(1)(e) EPC 1973 is not met. [2.4] It follows that the main request and the auxiliary request 2 are not allowable. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
In re Alphacritters, Inc., Serial No. 76573434 (July 27, 2009) [not precedential].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:06 pm by Old Fox
Sharia does not require a majority vote. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:00 am by CAFE
 Birbiglia does not shy away from the tough topics in his work and he shares how comedy has been a tool to help him work through personal struggles with health complications. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:23 am
Moreover, the Vanderbilt design has two distinctive and very important advantages over the competition: (1) The amount of robotic assistance adjusts automatically for users with some muscle control in their legs, allowing them to use their own muscles while walking. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 1:08 am
| Sunday SurprisesNever Too Late 166[week ending Sunday 1 October] Book Review: What if we could reimagine copyright? [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 3:20 am
Does this suggest that fraud may be based on reckless disregard for the truth? [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 6:44 am by Tamera H. Bennett
Beginning December 1, 2022, applicants (with the exception of Madrid Section 66(a) applicants) or registrants must respond within three months to either office actions/refusals issued during examination of an application or post registration office actions; one three-month extension can be requested for a fee of $125, but if the USPTO does not receive either the extension request or a response within the first three months, the application: will be abandoned; or the registration… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:23 am by Michael Risch
Note that non-public does not mean "secret. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 6:44 am by Tamera H. Bennett
Beginning December 1, 2022, applicants (with the exception of Madrid Section 66(a) applicants) or registrants must respond within three months to either office actions/refusals issued during examination of an application or post registration office actions; one three-month extension can be requested for a fee of $125, but if the USPTO does not receive either the extension request or a response within the first three months, the application: will be abandoned; or the registration… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:32 am
" In re Korn Ferry, Serial No. 90890949 (June 27, 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C. [read post]