Search for: "FELLOWS v. STATE"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Nothing a state legislature does under the authority of Moore v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:11 pm
T.K. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Coca-Cola only surveyed in 10 of the 27 Member States, which the court held to be less than a ‘significant proportion’ of the relevant public for the Mark. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:09 pm
I recently had an interesting email exchange with a couple of fellow bankruptcy attorneys on the subject of foreclosure. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Perhaps we’re being overly sensitive in rushing to the defense of a fellow blogger but if the regulators charged with protecting us all from false advertising don’t see any issues then perhaps it’s time for this rule to be amended as well. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided a comprehensive summary of last week’s military commission proceedings in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm
To be sure, that can't explain the problems occurring in "many other places," though it is not entirely beside the point that many of these "other places" might be in better shape if the United States were capable of responding adequately to the problems facing all states in our globalized political order. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
The culture wars have embraced the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
Today, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
Sunstein was joined by fellow HLS Professor Lani Guinier and Yale Law School Professors Akhil Amar and Reva Siegel. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:42 am
In Soares, et al v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 9:53 am
Prior Record Level/Prior Conviction Level To state the defendant’s felony prior record level: “The Court has determined that the defendant has ___ prior record point(s) and is therefore Prior Record Level [I/II/III/IV/V/VI]. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:38 am
Three interrelated developments explain this state of affairs. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
The ruling in Adams v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
” (Gorsuch was referring to United States v. [read post]
