Search for: "Garcia v. State"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 4:38 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:09 am
The case of Garcia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm
Update-1: On Jan. 23, 2025, responding to State of Washington et al v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Garcia, 17-834 Issues: (1) Whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act expressly pre-empts the states from using any information entered on or appended to a federal Form I-9, including common information such as name, date of birth, and social security number, in a prosecution of any person (citizen or alien) when that same, commonly used information also appears in non-IRCA documents, such as state tax forms, leases, and credit applications; and (2) if IRCA bars the… [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:57 pm
It means simply “deserving of reproof or rebuke”. [11] That broader meaning of reprehensible was endorsed in Garcia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
We are sure that these historian expert witnesses will improve their efforts to be comprehensive and balanced, with practice. 1 See, e.g., Garcia v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Garcia, 07-1052). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Garcia, 928 S.W.2d 307, 310 (Tex. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 11:23 am
[11] M.G. through Garcia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
Case citation: Monroy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Case citation: Norberg v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:01 am
Garcia, 452 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2006)). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:59 pm
Meshwerks v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 8:01 am
State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm
Today the Fourth Circuit denied the government's motion for an emergency stay in Garcia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Pacheco-Garcia v. [read post]
